ASSESSMENT
OF FUNGICIDE COMBINATIONS AS SEED TREATMENTS FOR CONTROLLING SILVER SCURF
(HELMINTHOSPORIUM SOLANI) DURING TUBER GROWTH, AT HARVEST AND DURING STORAGE
Mary Jo Frazier
A
seed lot naturally infected with silver scurf and an inoculated seed lot
were used in two similar field trials to study the effectiveness of several
fungicide combinations used as seed treatments in controlling silver scurf.
Seed and progeny tubers were subjectively evaluated for silver scurf infection
and the disease ratings compared. Evaluations were done early in the growing
season, at harvest and after storage. Most combinations of fungicides significantly
reduced the level of disease over benzimidazole fungicides alone or the
untreated control. Thiophanate methyl/mancozeb (Tops-MZ) and Captan/mancozeb
combinations were effective against silver scurf but the thiabendazole/mancozeb
combination was less effective. Imazalil sulfate reduced the silver scurf
infection but was less effective than the thiophanate methyl/mancozeb combination.
Fungicide combinations may be more effective than individual fungicide
applications in controlling silver scurf.
In an effort to test
a broad range of compounds for activity against silver scurf all of the same
treatments were not included in each test. Several classes of fungicides and
some experimental formulations were tested. Four treatments, Tops 2.5D, Tops-MZ,
TBZ -MZ, and Captan-MZ, all registered for use in Idaho, were included in
all three years' tests. Maxim was tested in 1993 and 1994 as a flowable formulation
and in 1994 and 1995 as a dust formulation.
In 1993, when seed
pieces were dug six weeks after planting and evaluated for disease, Tops-MZ,
Imazalil plus Tops-MZ, Captan-MZ and Maxim provided good control of H. solani
in the inoculated seed lot (Table 1). All treatments which included Imazalil
had a significantly lower disease rating than the untreated control. The
healthy control showed a low level of infection from contamination or a low
level of infection that had no visible symptoms on the seed. With the naturally
infected seed lot Tops-MZ, Imazalil plus Tops-MZ, and Maxim provided the
highest level of control but Captan-MZ and all the Imazalil treatments also
significantly reduced infection (Table 2). Disease ratings of the naturally
infected seed were slightly higher than with the inoculated seed. The natural
infection may have allowed the fungus to become established in the periderm
of the tuber where it was more resistant to the fungicide treatment. The
disease ratings on the seed pieces eleven weeks after planting were slightly
lower than at the six week evaluation. Treatments which were seen to significantly
reduced the disease in the six week evaluation also significantly reduced
the disease rating in the eleven week evaluation. At eleven weeks after
planting some transmission of the silver scurf fungus to the progeny tubers
was seen. The fungicide treatments which showed good control on the seed
piece showed significantly less disease in the progeny tubers. The same
trend was evident at the harvest evaluation but there was an increase in
the incidence and severity of the disease. This is consistent with other
researchers' investigations which show increasing disease severity the longer
the tubers remain in the field. The post storage evaluation showed very
little increase in disease after storage. This is contrary to many investigators
results which generally show an increase in silver scurf after storage.
Factors which may have contributed to this lack of disease increase in storage
are relatively cool storage temperature, adequate umidity control which
eliminated free moisture on the tubers, and the filtering of the air supply
to prevent cross contamination of samples.
Table 1. Disease
rating for inoculated seed lot in 1993
| Treatment |
6 weeks after planting
seed |
11 weeks after planting
seed |
11 weeks after planting
progeny |
harvest |
after 6 months storage |
| Untreated |
4.0 f |
3.8 ab |
1.5 de |
2.7 fg |
2.6 c |
| Tops 2.5D |
4.0 f |
3.7 ab |
1.6 e |
2.4 efg |
|
| Tops5 |
3.9 f |
3.7 ab |
1.1 ab |
2.9 g |
|
| TopsMZ |
1.0 a |
1.2 d |
1.0 a |
1.0 a |
1.1 a |
| TBZ |
3.9 f |
3.4 ab |
1.3 bcde |
2.1 de |
|
| TBZ-Mancozeb |
3.8 f |
3.3 b |
1.4 cde |
2.2 def |
|
| Imazalil-Tops 2.5D |
3.0 cde |
2.0 c |
1.0 ab |
2.1 de |
|
| Imazalil-Tops5 |
2.7 c |
2.5 c |
1.2 abcd |
1.7 bcd |
|
| Imazalil-TopsMZ |
1.0 a |
1.1 d |
1.0 ab |
1.1 a |
1.4 ab |
| Imazalil-TBZ |
3.3 de |
2.4 c |
1.1 ab |
1.8 cd |
|
| Imazalil-TBZ-Mancozeb |
3.3 e |
2.3 c |
1.2 abcd |
1.8 cd |
|
| Imazalil |
2.9 cd |
2.3 c |
1.1 ab |
1.5 abc |
|
| Captan-Mancozeb |
1.1 a |
1.1 d |
1.0 a |
1.3 abc |
1.3� ab |
| Maxim |
1.1 a |
1.1 c |
1.0 a |
1.2 ab |
1.1 a |
| Ozone |
4.0 f |
4.0 a |
1.2 abc |
2.2 def |
|
| Healthy |
1.7 b |
1.2 d |
1.0 a |
1.0 a |
1.6 b |
| LSD |
0.4 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
Disease rating based on scale
1-4, 1=no disease;2=slight infection;3=moderate infection; 4=heavy infection
Table 2. Disease
rating for naturally infected seed in 1993
| Treatment |
6 weeks after planting
seed |
11 weeks after planting
seed |
11 weeksafter planting
progeny |
harvest |
| Untreated |
4.0 f |
3.7 ab |
1.1 a |
2.4 cde |
| Tops 2.5D |
3.7 ef |
3.4 bc |
1.3 ab |
2.9 ef |
| Tops5 |
4.0 f |
3.2 bcd |
1.6 b |
2.3 cde |
| TopsMZ |
1.8 ab |
1.4 g |
1.0 a |
1.4 ab |
| TBZ |
3.9 f |
3.4 bc |
1.3 ab |
3.1 f |
| TBZ-Mancozeb |
3.9 f |
3.1 cd |
1.2 a |
2.7 def |
| Imazalil-Tops 2.5D |
2.6 cd |
2.2 f |
1.2 a |
2.3 cde |
| Imazalil-Tops�5 |
2.3 bc |
2.4 ef |
1.1 a |
2.4 cde |
| Imazalil-Tops�MZ |
1.3 a |
1.3 g |
1.1 a |
1.5 ab |
| Imazalil-TBZ |
2.5 c |
2.7 de |
1.0 a |
2.1 bcd |
| Imazalil-TBZ-Mancozeb |
3.2 de |
2.5 ef |
1.1 a |
2.0 bc |
| Imazalil |
2.8 cd |
2.4 ef |
1.0 a |
1.8 abc |
| Captan-Mancozeb |
2.5 c |
1.5 g |
1.0 a |
1.5 ab |
| Maxim |
1.7 ab |
1.1 g |
1.0 a |
1.2 a |
| Ozone |
3.8 ef |
3.9 a |
1.4 ab |
2.4 cde |
| Untreated |
2 4.0 f |
3.7 ab |
1.1 a |
2.5 cded |
| LSD |
0.64 |
0.37 |
0.70 |
|
Disease rating based on scale
1-4, 1=no disease;2=slight infection;3=moderate infection; 4=heavy infection
The disease rating
on the seed was much lower in 1994 than in 1993. Transmission of the disease
to progeny tubers was also reduced. This decrease in disease may be due to
the method of seed inoculation. In 1994 seed was inoculated in December,
1993, and then stored at seed storage temperatures. This method of inoculation
may not have allowed infection to readily occur. If the seed had been inoculated
immediately after harvest and then held at relatively warm curing temperatures
(12-15C) a more successful development of disease may have occurred. Weather
variability between the two years may also have been a factor. In 1993 total
precipitation was 1.4 cm the first 30 days following planting as compared
to 3.7 cm in 1994. The mean soil temperature in 1993 was 14C for the first
month contrasted to 12.7C in 1994. Fungicide treatments which provided a
reduced disease rating and incidence in 1993 also reduced disease in 1994.
Table 3. Disease
rating in 1994
| Treatment |
11 weeks after plantingseed |
11 weeks after planting
progeny |
harvest |
after 6 months storage |
| Tops 2.5D |
2.2 d |
1.0 ab |
1.5 e |
2.0 A |
| TopsMZ |
1.1 ab |
1.0 ab |
1.0 Aab BC |
1.0 C |
| Mancozeb |
1.1 ab |
1.0 a |
1.0 A |
1.1 C |
| Tops-PCNB |
1.6 c |
1.2 bc |
1.2 D |
|
| TF94 |
1.4 abc |
1.0 a |
1.0 A |
|
| TB94 |
1.5 bc |
1.0 ab |
1.2 CD |
|
| TBZ-Mancozeb |
1.1 ab |
1.0 a |
1.0 AB |
1.1 C |
| Captan-Mancozeb |
1.1 ab |
1.0� a |
1.0 A |
1.1 C |
| Captan |
1.1 ab |
1.0 ab |
1.0 A |
1.1 C |
| Maxim-dust |
1.0 a |
1.0 a |
1.0 A |
1.0 C |
| Maxim-F |
1.0 ab |
1.0 a |
1.0 A |
1.0 C |
| PHT 003 SS |
1.1 ab |
1.0 ab |
1.0 AB |
|
| Flutolanil+Polyram |
1.1 ab |
1.0 a |
1.1 ABC |
|
| Flutolanil+Polyram+Kasumin |
1.1 ab |
1.0 a |
1.0 A |
|
| Rovral on seed |
1.3 abc |
1.0 a |
1.2 BCD |
|
| Rovral in furrow |
1.3 abc |
1.2 c |
1.3 D |
|
| Untreated |
2.5 d |
1.1 ab |
1.3 D |
1.5 B |
| Healthy |
1.0 a |
1.0 a |
1.0 A |
1.0 C |
| LSD |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
Disease rating based on scale
1-4, 1=no disease;2=slight infection;3=moderate infection; 4=heavy infection�
Table 4. Disease
rating and yield in 1995
| Treatment |
11 weeks after plantingseed |
11 weeks after plantingprogeny |
harvest |
after 6 months storage |
Marketable yieldctw/ac |
Total yieldctw/ac |
| Tops 2.5D |
3.5 A |
1.3 A |
1.3 ABCD |
1.4 ab |
262 abc |
445.ab |
| TopsMZ |
1.9 BC |
1.0 C |
1.1 E |
1.1 de |
274 ab |
442 ab |
| Mancozeb |
2.3 B |
1.0 C |
1.2 ABCDE |
1.5 a |
278 ab |
464 a |
| TBZ-Mancozeb |
2.5 B |
1.0 C |
1.1 DE |
1.2 cde |
275 ab |
417 abcd |
| Captan-Mancozeb |
1.2 C |
1.0 C |
1.0 E |
1.1 de |
292 a |
456 ab |
| Captan |
2.0 BC |
1.0 C |
1.1 CDE |
1.3 bc |
258 abc |
390 cd |
| Maxim�-dust 0.5% |
1.3 C |
1.0 C |
1.0 E |
1.0 e |
290 a |
434 abc |
| Maxim�-dust 0.33% |
1.3 C |
1.0 C |
1.0 E |
1.0 e |
292 a |
447 ab |
| Flutolanil+Mancozeb |
1.5 C |
1.0 C |
1.1 E |
|
286 ab |
442 ab |
| Untreated |
4.0 A |
1.2 ABC |
1.3 ABC |
1.6 a |
279 ab |
419 abcd |
| Healthy |
1.6 C |
1.0 C |
1.1 CDE |
1.1 de |
293 a |
413 bcd |
| LSD |
0.7 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
40.2 |
50 |
Disease rating based on scale
1-4, 1=no disease;2=slight infection;3=moderate infection;4=heavy infection
Conclusions
At full stand establishment,
no significant differences in plant populations were seen for any treatment.
Plant emergence when compared over the three years of the study showed
no significant effects due to seed treatment. Tops-MZ, Captan-MZ and Maxim
seed treatments provided good control of H. solani on the seed. The noninoculated
control showed a low level of infection, probably due to a low level of
natural infection in the seed or to soil-borne inoculum. Silver scurf was
observed on the progeny tubers eleven weeks after planting. The fungicide
treatments which showed good control on the seed piece resulted in significantly
less disease in the progeny tubers. The same trend was evident for the harvest
evaluation, but there was an increase in the incidence and severity of
the disease. This is consistent with previous research that shows increasing
disease severity the longer the tubers remain in the field (Wilcockson et
al., 1985). The post-storage evaluations showed only a slight increase in
silver scurf severity after 5 months of storage. Other researchers have
reported a significant increase in silver scurf after storage (Adams and
Hide, 1980). The incubation of samples prior to disease evaluation made
detection of all infection sites possible regardless of size. Factors that
may have limited both spread and increase in severity of disease while in
storage are relatively cool storage temperature, adequate humidity control
(which eliminated free moisture on the tubers), and the filtering of the
air supply to prevent contamination of samples. Treatment differences were
consistent in all three years, however yearly differences varied, perhaps
due to environmental factors (Hide and Adams, 1980).
The use of effective seed treatments significantly reduced the incidence
and severity of silver scurf in progeny tubers. Reducing the severity of
the disease at harvest with the use of seed treatments may limit the amount
of disease development in storage. The development of resistance to TPM and
TBZ in isolates of H. solani has become a serious problem. Resistance may
develop to other seed treatment chemicals with single site modes of action
if used in a widespread and exclusive manner. This tendency toward fungicide
resistance may be combated by combining single site action fungicides with
multi-site activity partners such as TPM-MZ. Alternatively, rotating the
use of fungicides among different chemical classes in successive generations
will help slow the build up of fungicide resistance (Hide and Hall, 1993).
Control of silver scurf was superior when fungicide combinations were used.
TPM-MZ, Captan-MZ, and fludioxonil are effective for control of silver scurf
and provide alternatives to benzimidazoles alone.
|